GenAI Benchmarks

“I want to generate print-ready files”

Full-bleed art, cards, calendars and photo products, generated inside your product or pipeline. What kills a print run: low native resolution, banding, and colors that shift when they hit CMYK.

Print products
The benchmark avocado mascot as a print operator, holding a freshly printed poster of itself with crop marks and CMYK color bars
Scores

Recommended models

Same measurements as the main rankings, weighted for this job. The weight matrix is 100% covered by scored criteria (auto tier plus the interim Claude-VLM quality tier); any criterion still awaiting review is excluded and the weights renormalized, never faked.
Pilot dataset (pilot-0), weighted for print products.
  Use-case score Criteria covered $ / image
1. Seedream 4.5
Best fit
3.64 / 5 100% $0.048
2. Seedream 5.0 Lite 3.50 / 5 100% $0.020
3. GPT Image 1.5 3.45 / 5 100% $0.120
4. Nano Banana 2 Lite 3.05 / 5 100% $0.020
5. Nano Banana 2 3.01 / 5 100% $0.100
6. Nano Banana Pro 3.00 / 5 100% $0.360
7. Luma Photon 2.95 / 5 100% $0.019
8. Ideogram 3.0 2.83 / 5 100% $0.060
9. Recraft V3 2.76 / 5 100% $0.040
10. FLUX.2 2.68 / 5 100% $0.013
11. FLUX.2 [dev] Turbo 2.65 / 5 100% $0.015
12. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image 2.64 / 5 100% $0.039
13. FLUX.2 [pro] 2.46 / 5 100% $0.040
14. Qwen-Image 2.36 / 5 100% $0.030
15. Stable Diffusion 1.5 1.64 / 5 100% $0.010
Want the raw numbers instead? See the full model rankings
Methodology

How this is weighted

Resolution and color fidelity carry two thirds of the weight because they are the two failures print cannot hide: a low-res master bands on paper, and a drifted brand color survives every proof until the run is on the press. Text accuracy matters where cards and calendars carry set copy, alpha covers die-cut products, and cost and latency barely register because print jobs are batched, not interactive.

Weights are provisional (pilot-0) and published in full; the reviewed matrix ships with the frozen suite. Read the methodology
  • Resolution 35%
  • Color Accuracy 30%
  • Text Accuracy 15%
  • Transparency 10%
  • Cost 5%
  • Latency 5%
Evidence

The evidence: Seedream 4.5

Seedream 4.5 takes the top spot where this job puts its weight: resolution at 5.0 / 5 (35% of the matrix), color accuracy at 2.9 / 5 (30% of the matrix) and text accuracy at 4.9 / 5 (15% of the matrix).

The best-fit model's results on the benchmarks that matter for this use case. Click through for the full cross-model comparison.
Takeaway

The last mile: what no model delivers

No model in this suite outputs press-ready files. Bleed, safe zones, exact brand colors and CMYK intent are deterministic requirements, and generation is probabilistic. Teams that ship print products route generation through a gateway, then finish in an editable canvas: snap colors to the brand palette, fix type, and export with bleed and crop marks.

AI Editor

Generate with any model. Finish in the AI Editor.

Give your users the control they need to be productive with generative AI. The IMG.LY AI Editor turns print products generations into finished, on-spec assets: background removal, brand kits and editable text on a real canvas.

IMG.LY AI Editor: generative image tools next to manual editing controls on a canvas