Print – IMG.LY Blog

The Best GenAI Models for Web-to-Print: A Buyer's Guide

Jan — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT

No single generative model is “best” for web-to-print. The right pick depends on the specific job, and print has jobs that screen-first leaderboards don’t measure. A model that tops a general image-quality benchmark can still be useless for print if it can’t render legible text, can’t output vector, or shifts hard out of CMYK gamut.

This guide gives you the criteria that actually matter for print, a scoring rubric to apply them, and a model-by-model read on where each one wins. The goal is to route each task to the model that fits it, which is why a model-agnostic (“bring your own model”) integration matters more than any one provider’s marketing.

How to read this guide. The criteria and rubric are the durable part. The model roster moves monthly: treat the specific model notes as a snapshot, and re-run the rubric against current versions before you commit. The per-model benchmark scores come from IMG.LY’s print benchmark suite, which we’re opening to early-access subscribers soon (sign-up at the end of this guide).

Why print needs its own criteria

A web-to-print product sells a physical object. That changes what “good” means:

The output is measured at 300 DPI on a substrate, not at 72 PPI on a retina screen.
Color is CMYK and spot, not sRGB.
Logos and type must scale and stay crisp: vector, not pixels.
The customer is a non-designer, so the model has to be controllable enough to stay inside a template.
And because it’s a commercial product sold to a customer, the licensing of the output carries real legal exposure.

General benchmarks (LMArena-style human preference, aesthetic scores) miss most of this. The eleven criteria below are built around it.

The eleven evaluation criteria

1. Output type and format: raster vs. vector

Why it matters for print: Logos, icons, line art, and type need to scale to any size and print crisply. Raster can’t; vector can. A model that outputs (or can be cleanly traced to) native SVG / vector is uniquely valuable for the print-specific elements that screen apps don’t care about.

What to test: Can it produce vector natively? If not, how cleanly does its output vectorize? Does the vector survive into PDF/X as real paths?

2. Resolution and maximum dimensions

Why it matters: A ~1024px generation is ~3.4” at 300 DPI. Large-format and even A4 need far more. Native max resolution, and how well the model holds detail when upscaled, determines whether you can print the output at size without a quality penalty.

What to test: Native max output dimensions; detail retention at 4×/8× upscale; effective printable size at 300 DPI.

3. Visual quality and fidelity

Why it matters: The baseline. Realism, coherence, absence of artifacts, anatomical and structural correctness. Crucially, how it holds up under print’s unforgiving close inspection: banding, mushy detail, and plasticky textures show more on paper than on screen.

What to test: Side-by-side preference on print-representative prompts; artifact rate; detail at print scale.

4. Text and typography rendering

Why it matters: Print is full of words, and most models garble text inside images. For anything where text-in-image is unavoidable (a generated poster, a label motif), legibility and kerning are make-or-break. Best practice is still to set real type as a separate layer, but some jobs need it baked in.

What to test: Legibility of short and long strings; correct spelling; kerning; multi-line; non-Latin scripts.

5. Prompt adherence and controllability

Why it matters: Non-designers need predictable results, and templates need the output to land where it’s told. Controllability spans prompt adherence, image-to-image / inpainting / outpainting, style and reference-image conditioning, and seed stability for repeatable results.

What to test: Does it honor constraints? Quality of edits (generative fill, expand, object removal)? Reference-image fidelity? Same-seed reproducibility?

6. Color accuracy and CMYK-readiness

Why it matters: Vivid RGB outputs clip hard in CMYK and shift on press. Models that stay closer to printable gamut, and outputs that convert predictably, mean fewer surprises and less soft-proofing friction.

What to test: Gamut coverage vs. CMYK; shift magnitude after ICC conversion; behavior on brand-critical colors and near-whites/blacks.

7. Transparency and background handling

Why it matters: Merch, stickers, die-cuts, and product compositing need clean subjects on transparent backgrounds and accurate edges (hair, glass, fine detail). Native transparent output and clean cutout edges save a manual masking step.

What to test: Native alpha output; edge quality on hard cases; cutout-path readiness.

8. Responsiveness / latency

Why it matters: Two very different bars. In an interactive editor, anything over a few seconds breaks flow. In a batch/VDP run, throughput and concurrency matter more than per-image speed. The right model differs by context.

What to test: P50/P95 latency at your resolution; throughput under concurrency; cold-start behavior.

9. Cost per generation

Why it matters: Unit economics. A few cents per image is invisible for interactive one-offs and brutal across a 100k-recipient VDP run. Price has to be weighed against quality for the specific job. You don’t pay flagship prices for a draft thumbnail.

What to test: Cost per image at your resolution/step settings; cost of edit vs. generate; volume pricing.

10. Consistency and repeatability

Why it matters: Brand work needs the same input to yield the same (or controllably similar) output, and product likenesses must not drift. Seed control, character and style consistency, and low variance separate “brand-safe” models from “slot-machine” ones.

What to test: Variance across runs at fixed seed; character/style consistency across a set; drift on iterative edits.

11. Commercial licensing and IP safety

Why it matters: You’re selling the printed output. Commercial-use rights, training-data provenance, indemnification, and content/safety filtering are legal exposure, not fine print. A model that’s brilliant but legally murky is a non-starter for a product customers resell.

What to test: Commercial-use terms; indemnity; provenance/transparency; enterprise and data-handling terms; content-filter behavior.

The scoring rubric

Score each model 1–5 on each criterion, then weight by your use case. Suggested weights for the three most common web-to-print contexts:

Criterion	Interactive design tool	High-volume VDP / automation	Merch / POD
1. Vector / SVG output	High	Medium	Medium
2. Resolution / max size	High	High	High
3. Visual quality	High	Medium	High
4. Text rendering	Medium	High	Medium
5. Controllability / editing	High	High	High
6. CMYK-readiness	High	High	High
7. Transparency / cutout	Medium	Low	High
8. Responsiveness	High	Medium (throughput)	High
9. Cost per generation	Medium	High	Medium
10. Consistency	Medium	High	High
11. Licensing / IP	High	High	High

Scoring scale: 1 = unusable for print · 2 = weak · 3 = workable with mitigation · 4 = strong · 5 = best-in-class.

Drop your internal benchmark numbers into the matrix below. The qualitative notes give you a starting hypothesis to test, not a substitute for your own runs.

Models by job

New models ship faster than any ranking can keep up with, so this section is organized by job, the way you actually route requests. Models are drawn from the roster currently wired into CE.SDK’s AI plugins.

Job A: Text-to-image (generate a new asset)

Candidates: Recraft V3, Recraft 20B, Seedream V4, Nano Banana, Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 1, Ideogram V3.

Model	Stand-out for print	Watch-outs	Benchmark
Recraft V3	The print specialist: native vector/SVG generation, strong text rendering, brand-style controls. Often the single most print-relevant text-to-image model.	Verify max raster resolution for large-format jobs.	… coming soon
Recraft 20B	Faster, cheaper Recraft tier. Good for interactive iteration before a final Recraft V3 render.	Quality step-down vs. V3.	… coming soon
Seedream V4	High visual fidelity and resolution; strong general-purpose hero imagery.	Text rendering and vector are not its strength.	… coming soon
Nano Banana / Pro	Fast, controllable, strong prompt adherence; Pro for higher quality. Good interactive default.	Confirm commercial-licensing terms for resale.	… coming soon
GPT Image 1	Strong instruction-following and comparatively reliable in-image text; good for layout-aware generation.	Latency and cost on the higher side for interactive use.	… coming soon
Ideogram V3	Best-in-class text rendering: the pick when legible words in the image are non-negotiable (posters, typographic art).	Less suited to photoreal product scenes.	… coming soon

Routing heuristic: logos, icons, and typographic art go to Recraft V3 (vector). Words-in-image goes to Ideogram V3 or GPT Image 1. Photoreal hero imagery goes to Seedream V4 or Nano Banana Pro. Fast interactive drafts go to Recraft 20B / Nano Banana.

Job B: Image editing (adapt a customer’s asset)

Candidates: Flux Pro Kontext, Flux Pro Kontext Max, Nano Banana Edit, Nano Banana Pro Edit, Qwen Image Edit, Gemini Flash Edit, Seedream V4 Edit, GPT Image 1, Ideogram V3 Remix.

Model	Stand-out for print	Watch-outs	Benchmark
Flux Pro Kontext / Max	Strong instruction-based editing with high subject preservation: change one thing without wrecking the rest. Good for generative fill/expand and targeted edits.	Max tier costs more; budget per edit.	… coming soon
Nano Banana Edit / Pro Edit	Fast, controllable edits; good interactive default for object removal and swaps.	Verify edge quality on fine detail.	… coming soon
Qwen Image Edit	Strong editing with good text handling during edits.	Validate commercial terms.	… coming soon
Gemini Flash Edit	Low latency: the responsiveness pick for interactive editing.	Quality trade-off vs. heavier models.	… coming soon
Seedream V4 Edit	High-fidelity edits matching its generation quality.	Heavier; weigh latency.	… coming soon

Routing heuristic: precise “change X, keep everything else” goes to Flux Kontext. Fast interactive edits go to Gemini Flash Edit / Nano Banana Edit. Edits that must preserve in-image text go to Qwen Image Edit.

Job C: Specialized print operations

These aren’t single “models” so much as task pipelines, but they belong in the routing table:

Task	Approach / model	Note
Vectorize (raster → SVG)	Vectorize plugin / Recraft vector	The print-critical one: protects logos and PDF/X vector output.
Background removal	`@imgly/background-removal` (in-browser)	On-device, instant, privacy-preserving. Feeds cutout paths.
Image correction & DPI	Perfectly Clear plugin + DPI validation	Auto-corrects exposure, color, sharpness, and noise; validation flags undersized images. Prefer high-res native generation over upscaling.
Text generation / copy	Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-4.1 Nano	Headlines, rewrites, per-recipient VDP copy.
Text-to-speech / sound	ElevenLabs (where relevant)	Less common in print; relevant for multi-channel campaigns.

The quick-reference picks

If you skip the rubric and just want today’s defaults, this is the snapshot we’d start from. Treat it as the hypothesis your own benchmarks confirm or overturn, not a verdict.

Print job	Pick	Why
Logos, icons, line art, anything that must scale	Recraft V3	The only major model with native SVG/vector output. Everything else hands you pixels to trace. Vector survives into PDF/X as real paths and prints sharp at any size.
Legible text inside the image (posters, labels, packaging motifs)	Ideogram V3, with GPT Image 1 / Nano Banana Pro close behind	Ideogram was built around typography; kerning and spelling hold where most models produce letter-shaped mush. Still, bake text in only when you must: real type as a separate editor layer beats all of them.
Photoreal hero imagery at print size	Seedream V4 or Nano Banana Pro	Resolution is the print bottleneck. Seedream V4 generates up to 4K natively (about 13.6” at 300 DPI before any upscaling); Nano Banana Pro outputs 2K/4K. A 1024px generation from anything else is a 3.4” image betting on the upscaler.
”Change X, keep everything else” edits	Flux Kontext Pro / Max	Best-in-class instruction-following edits with subject preservation, which is critical when the asset is the customer’s product photo and “the AI improved it” means a reprint. The Nano Banana family is the consistency pick for variants of one subject.
Interactive drafts (speed and cost)	Recraft 20B, Gemini Flash Edit, base Nano Banana	In an editor, a 20-second generation is a bounce. Draft cheap and fast, then re-render the final with the heavyweight. The customer never needs to know two models were involved.
Data sovereignty / self-hosting	Qwen-Image / Qwen Image Edit	Apache 2.0 open weights. For European operators and government buyers who won’t send customer uploads to a US API, “we can run it ourselves” beats a quality delta.
VDP copy and headlines	Claude Sonnet 4.6	Cheap enough per recipient at 100k-mailer volume, and strong at length-constrained rewriting: the “fit this text frame” problem.

Two of those rationales carry more weight than the rest.

Vector is the criterion that decides printability. Screen products never need vector, so general models never optimized for it, and Recraft sits almost alone on the one measure that determines whether a logo prints cleanly at size. If you adopt a single routing rule from this guide, make it this one.

Resolution and color are pipeline problems the model can only start. No model outputs CMYK; every one generates sRGB. “CMYK-readiness” is really about how hard a model’s palette clips on conversion, and your ICC and soft-proofing pipeline owns the rest. Same with DPI: pair every generation path with validation and a dedicated upscaler rather than trusting native output. You can swap the model whenever you want; the print-correctness layer around it has to stay put.

One roster note: Adobe Firefly isn’t wired into CE.SDK’s plugin roster today, but for licensing-sensitive enterprises its trained-on-licensed-content and indemnification story is the strongest answer to criterion 11. Include it in your own evaluation if criterion 11 dominates your weighting.

A worked decision: which model wins for your product?

The rubric resolves to a different answer per context. Three quick reads:

Interactive design tool (non-designers personalizing templates). Weight responsiveness, controllability, and vector. Likely stack: Recraft 20B / Nano Banana for fast generation, Recraft V3 for final vector, Gemini Flash Edit for interactive edits. The customer iterates fast and the final asset is print-clean.
High-volume VDP / automation (100k personalized mailers). Weight cost, throughput, consistency, and licensing. Likely stack: a cost-efficient generation model at high concurrency, Claude Sonnet 4.6 for per-recipient copy, seed-locked for repeatability, all run headless. Per-unit cost dominates the decision.
Merch / POD (user art on physical products). Weight transparency/cutout, resolution, and quality. Likely stack: background removal plus cutout for subjects, upscaling for resolution, Seedream V4 / Nano Banana Pro for generated designs, with hard licensing checks because the output is resold.

In every case, the conclusion is the same: no one model wins all three. The advantage is in being able to route each task to the model that wins it, and to swap models as better ones appear, without re-architecting your editor.

What makes per-job routing practical: native plugins + the AI Gateway

A criteria-driven, route-per-job strategy only works if switching models is cheap. If wiring in a new model means a new API integration, new auth, new key management, new error handling, and new billing plumbing every time, you’ll quietly standardize on whatever you integrated first, and inherit its weaknesses on every job it loses.

CE.SDK is built to avoid that:

Every image model in this guide is natively supported as an AI plugin. Text-to-image and image editing run as drop-in providers inside the editor, not bespoke integrations you build and maintain. Background removal, vectorization, and image correction (Perfectly Clear) ship as their own plugins, and text generation routes through built-in Anthropic and OpenAI providers. Adopting Recraft for vector, Ideogram for text, and Flux Kontext for edits is configuration, not three separate engineering projects.
The AI Gateway gives you one unified surface to every model. Instead of stitching together a dozen provider APIs, key schemes, and rate-limit behaviors, you call models through a single managed layer. That’s what turns “route each task to the best model” from an architecture diagram into a one-line config change, and what lets you swap a model the day a better one ships, without touching your editor or your print pipeline.
Outputs land inside the print pipeline, not beside it. Whatever model produces the asset, it flows into locked templates with bleed, safe-area, and DPI constraints, then through CMYK / spot-color / PDF/X-3 export. The model is interchangeable; print correctness is not. Print-on-demand company The Print Bar and direct-mail platform PostBuddy both built on this pipeline, embedding CE.SDK rather than maintaining their own print editor.

So the “best model” question is no longer a one-time, high-stakes bet on a single provider; it’s an ongoing optimization. The benchmark scores below tell you which model to route each job to today, and the native-plugin and Gateway architecture is what lets you act on that answer and revisit it when the scores change next quarter.

The IMG.LY print benchmark matrix

IMG.LY is building a print benchmark suite that scores every model in this guide against all eleven criteria, on print-representative prompts, with the weighted totals per use case already worked out. It is rolling out to early-access subscribers first. Subscribe to our newsletter to get the full scored matrix, and the test set behind it, before it is public.

Model	1 Vector	2 Res	3 Quality	4 Text	5 Control	6 CMYK	7 Transp.	8 Speed	9 Cost	10 Consist.	11 License	Weighted (Interactive)	Weighted (VDP)	Weighted (Merch)
Recraft V3
Recraft 20B
Seedream V4
Nano Banana Pro
GPT Image 1
Ideogram V3
Flux Pro Kontext
Gemini Flash Edit
Qwen Image Edit

The IMG.LY print benchmark suite is coming soon

Every model scored 1–5 across all eleven print criteria, with weighted totals per use case. Early-access subscribers get it first.

The criteria and the routing logic above stand on their own. The scored numbers are what the suite adds: a measured, repeatable answer for each cell, refreshed as models change.

Bottom line

Pick criteria before you pick models. For web-to-print, the criteria that screen benchmarks ignore (vector output, print resolution, CMYK behavior, text legibility, licensing) are exactly the ones that decide whether a beautiful generation is a sellable print. Score the current models against those criteria for your context, route each job to the model that wins it, and run it all through CE.SDK’s native AI plugins and AI Gateway so re-routing tomorrow, after the next leaderboard reshuffle, is a config change rather than a rebuild.

Companion piece: How to Leverage Generative AI in Web-to-Print covers the use cases, integration patterns, and print-specific pitfalls behind these model choices.

How to Leverage Generative AI in Web-to-Print

Jan — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT

Web-to-print sells self-service: your customer designs a postcard, a flyer, a t-shirt, a packaging label in the browser and orders it without a designer in the loop. For years, though, the self-service stopped at the hard part. Someone still had to supply a usable image. Someone still had to know what 300 DPI meant. When they didn’t, the file landed on a prepress desk to be fixed by hand.

One operator we spoke to put it bluntly: his designers spend roughly 40% of their time fixing customer artwork rather than creating templates. Tom Rowe of The Print Bar described what that looks like at the design step: “Our brand didn’t match our experience. You could see it in our bounce rates.”

Generative AI changes the economics of that hard part. It can turn a prompt into a usable asset, lift a 72-DPI logo to something printable, and strip a background in the browser before a human ever sees the file, removing the specific friction that kept self-service from being self-service in the first place.

It can also go wrong: aimed carelessly, the same models produce beautiful screen images that fall apart on press. This post is about the difference between the two: the use cases worth building, and the print-specific realities you have to design around.

The shift: from “upload a print-ready file” to “describe what you want”

The old web-to-print contract asked the customer to arrive with a finished, technically correct asset. That filter excluded most of the market: the CRM manager, the franchise owner, the small-business buyer who “knows Canva because they make their wedding invitations on it” but has never opened InDesign and never will.

Generative AI moves the burden of production off the customer. Instead of “upload a 300 DPI CMYK image with 3mm bleed,” the ask becomes “type what you want on the card.” The editor, not the customer and not your prepress team, becomes responsible for turning intent into a production-safe file.

That principle runs through everything below: AI is most valuable in web-to-print where it removes a step the customer was never qualified to do. The closer a use case sits to it, the more it returns.

The use cases worth building

1. Generate on-brand imagery from a prompt (text-to-image)

This is the most obvious win. A customer needs a hero image, a background, a seasonal motif, or a product scene, and doesn’t have one. Text-to-image generation lets them describe it and get options in seconds, without a stock-photo license hunt or a design request ticket.

In a print context the point is unblocking the order, not novelty for its own sake. The customer who would have abandoned at “I don’t have a good image” now keeps going. Models like Recraft V3, Seedream V4, Ideogram V3, and the Nano Banana family each have different strengths here (covered in depth in the companion guide, The Best GenAI Models for Web-to-Print), but the integration pattern is the same: generation feeds a placeholder inside a locked template, so the output lands inside your bleed, safe-area, and brand constraints automatically.

Watch out: generated images are usually delivered at screen resolution, often around 1024px. That’s fine for a business card photo, marginal for an A4 flyer, and unusable for large-format. Pair generation with upscaling (below) and size validation before you let it reach export.

2. Adapt and extend customer-supplied images (image-to-image, generative fill/expand)

Customers rarely arrive with an asset that fits your canvas. It’s the wrong aspect ratio, it has the wrong background, or it’s a portrait crop where you need a landscape banner. Image-to-image editing and generative expand (outpainting) solve the most common case: extending an image to fill bleed or a different SKU’s dimensions instead of stretching or letterboxing it.

This is quietly one of the highest-value print use cases, because aspect-ratio and bleed mismatches are a top source of prepress rework. Generative fill also handles object removal (“take the coffee cup off the desk”), background swaps, and clean-up: the edits a non-designer can’t do in any tool they own.

Watch out: outpainting invents pixels. On a brand asset or a product photo, “invented” can mean “wrong.” Keep generative expand to backgrounds and ambient areas. Never let it reconstruct a logo, a face, or a product the customer is actually selling.

3. Background removal and cutouts for mockups and merch

Background removal is the workhorse. For merch and print-on-demand it’s the difference between a customer’s snapshot and a clean subject that drops onto a t-shirt, mug, or sticker. IMG.LY runs this in the browser (via the open-source @imgly/background-removal package), which matters for two reasons: it’s instant enough for an interactive editor, and the customer’s image never has to leave the device.

Paired with the cutout plugin, background removal also feeds the literal cut lines for die-cut stickers, labels, and packaging, turning a removed background into a production path.

Watch out: browser-based removal is excellent on clear subjects and struggles on hair, glass, and fine fringes. For a print product that will be inspected up close, expose a manual refine step rather than trusting the mask blindly.

4. Vectorize raster art into print-scalable graphics

This is the use case print people care about most and screen-first builders forget. A customer uploads a logo as a small, jagged PNG. Printed at size, it’s mush. Vectorization (AI raster-to-SVG) traces it into clean, resolution-independent paths that scale to any output size and reproduce crisply on press.

Vectorize is also how you get logos and simple graphics into a state your PDF/X pipeline can preserve as vector, instead of rasterizing everything and throwing away the scalability you vectorized for. Recraft V3 is notable here because it can generate natively vector output rather than only tracing after the fact.

Watch out: vectorization is great for logos, icons, and flat art. It’s the wrong tool for a photograph. Detect the asset type and route photos to upscaling, not tracing.

5. Resolution and image quality: upscaling, correction, and DPI repair

The single most common web-to-print failure is a low-resolution image: the 72-DPI photo that looks fine on screen and prints as a blurry mess. Two different AI operations fix it, and it pays to keep them straight, because they solve different problems.

Upscaling (super-resolution) raises the actual pixel count, reconstructing detail to lift a small image toward a printable size. It’s a generative step you route to a dedicated model, the same way you route a text-to-image prompt; the strong upscalers can take a 1024px generation to 4K. Reach for it when the source is simply too small for its placed size.

Image correction is the other half, and it ships in CE.SDK today as the Perfectly Clear plugin. It auto-corrects exposure, contrast, color, tint, sharpness, and noise in a single pass. It won’t add pixels, but it gets the most printable result out of the pixels you have, which is what a dim, soft phone photo usually needs more than raw resolution.

Tie both to your DPI validation. When the editor detects an image below your minimum threshold for its placed size, offer to correct or upscale it instead of just blocking export. You convert a dead end into a one-click fix, the kind of “they don’t need to know what DPI is” experience operators are chasing.

Watch out: upscaling fabricates detail. It rescues marginal images; it can’t conjure a sharp 4-megapixel product shot from a thumbnail, and correction can’t add resolution at all. Set honest thresholds, and still warn when the source is hopeless.

6. Copy and variable text generation (text + VDP at scale)

Generative text earns its place in two spots. First, as a writing aid inside the editor: headline options, a tagline, a “make it shorter / more formal / fit this space” rewrite for the non-writer staring at an empty text box. Second, and more powerfully for print, in Variable Data Printing: generating or localizing per-recipient copy across thousands of personalized postcards, mailers, or labels from a single template.

VDP is the highest-leverage place to use generative text: generate the variants, merge them into print-ready files in headless mode, and run the batch.

Watch out: generated copy needs guardrails. Length limits so it doesn’t overflow the text frame, tone and brand constraints, and a human-review gate for anything legally sensitive: pricing, claims, regulated industries.

7. Template adaptation and auto-resize across SKUs

A print catalog is the same design across many sizes and substrates: the same campaign as a postcard, a flyer, a poster, a social tile. AI-assisted resize and re-layout adapt one master design to every SKU’s dimensions, reflowing content intelligently instead of scaling it blindly. Combined with locked templates, you expand SKUs without re-authoring each one.

Watch out: reflow decisions still need brand rules. Lock what must stay fixed (logo size, safe area, mandatory legal text) so the AI rearranges within your constraints, not over them.

8. Guided prepress correction

Instead of rejecting a bad file after the fact, use AI to catch and fix problems inside the editor: flag the low-res image and offer to upscale it, detect text outside the safe area and nudge it in, notice a near-white “white” that won’t print and correct it. The same problems your prepress team used to fix by hand get caught here, before the order is placed.

Watch out: auto-correction must be transparent and reversible. Show the customer what changed and let them undo it. Silent “helpful” edits to someone’s artwork erode trust fast.

9. Localization and market variants

For franchise networks and multi-market brands, AI translation plus regeneration of localized imagery and copy turns one approved master into 12 market versions, each print-ready and on-brand, without a translation agency or 12 design tickets. A 200-location franchise can ship 200 localized flyers with the same brand guideline enforced by the editor on every one.

Watch out: machine translation in regulated or legal copy needs human sign-off, and text expansion (German runs roughly 30% longer than English) will break tight layouts unless your template frames can flex.

10. Realistic product previews

Generative and 3D-assisted mockups show the design on the actual product: the shirt, the mug, the folded brochure, the box, not an abstract artboard. Operators consistently tie this to higher conversion and fewer “will this look right?” support tickets, because the preview matches what arrives on the doorstep.

Watch out: a preview that’s prettier than the print sets up a disappointed customer and a reprint. Calibrate mockups to real output, including substrate color and finish.

The print-specific realities

Most generative models are built for screens. Print adds requirements the web doesn’t have, and the ones below are where projects most often break.

Resolution and DPI

Generated images typically arrive at around 1024px. At 300 DPI that’s about a 3.4-inch image: fine for a business card, not for a poster. Always validate output resolution against placed size, and route undersized assets through upscaling before export. Treat raw generation resolution as a starting point, not a deliverable.

Color: sRGB in, CMYK out

Models generate in RGB. Print is CMYK, plus spot colors. The vivid blues, greens, and oranges that look great on screen sit outside the CMYK gamut and will shift on press. Your pipeline, not the model, owns this: convert with the right ICC profile, validate against the print provider’s color requirements, and preserve named spot colors through to the PDF/X. Show the customer a soft-proof so the shift isn’t a surprise on delivery.

Vector vs. raster (and the “everything got rastered” trap)

Most models output raster. For logos, type, and line art that need to scale and print crisply, raster is the wrong format, and a PDF that rasterizes all text and vectors is, in one operator’s words, “death for the printer.” Use vector-native generation (e.g. Recraft) and vectorization for the elements that need it, and make sure your export keeps vector and text as vector with CMYK values preserved (PDF/X-3), not flattened to pixels.

Text rendering inside images

Generative models are notoriously unreliable at rendering legible text inside an image: garbled words, invented letters, wrong kerning. For anything that must be readable in print, don’t bake text into a generated image. Generate the imagery, then set real, editable, vectorizable type as a separate layer in the editor. If you must generate text-in-image, Ideogram and Recraft are the stronger choices; see the companion guide.

Brand safety and guardrails

Let customers generate anything and you lose brand control. Box generation inside locked templates instead: it fills a defined placeholder, within fixed margins, alongside a logo and palette the customer can’t move. A franchisee can change the headline and the photo; the logo size, position, and safe area stay locked. AI expands what the customer can create without expanding what they can break.

Commercial and licensing rights

A web-to-print product is sold. That makes the IP status of generated assets a question you have to answer before you ship. Does your model provider grant commercial-use rights to outputs? Are there indemnities? Does training-data provenance create exposure for a customer reselling the printed product? Pick models and providers whose commercial terms you’ve actually read, and surface usage terms where they matter.

Cost and latency (the unit economics)

Every generation costs money and time. In an interactive editor, a 30-second generation is a broken experience. In a high-volume VDP run, a few cents per asset multiplied by 100,000 recipients is a real line item. Match the model to the job: a fast, cheap model for interactive iteration, a higher-quality (slower, pricier) model for the final render. Cache aggressively. The companion guide scores models on that trade-off.

Data privacy and sovereignty

Customer-uploaded images can be sensitive: faces, IDs, confidential product designs. Browser-based processing (background removal, some editing) keeps data on-device. API-based generation sends it to a third party, which has GDPR and data-residency implications, especially for European customers and government buyers who “prioritize a European vendor for data sovereignty.” Be explicit about what runs locally vs. in the cloud, and choose providers accordingly.

Hallucination and consistency

Generative output is non-deterministic. The same prompt yields different results, and details drift. For brand assets, product likenesses, and anything a customer will compare against reality, constrain hard (reference images, seeds, image-to-image rather than free generation) and keep a human gate on the outputs that matter.

How IMG.LY approaches it

All of these constraints point the same way: AI is a step inside a print pipeline, not a feature bolted onto an editor. A few principles shape how CE.SDK handles it:

Model-agnostic by design. The AI plugins connect to any third-party model or API: bring your own model. You’re not locked to one provider’s quality, price, or licensing terms. You route each task to the model that wins it, and swap models as better ones ship every few weeks.
The AI Gateway provides managed access to models for editors, so you’re not stitching together a dozen API integrations and key-management schemes yourself.
Generation lands inside the print pipeline. Outputs flow into locked templates with bleed, safe areas, DPI thresholds, and brand constraints already enforced, then through a CMYK / spot-color / PDF/X-3 export that keeps vectors and text as vectors. The model never gets to bypass print correctness.
Drop-in generative features. Background removal, generative fill, image-to-image, vectorize, and text-to-image are available as plugins, so you adopt the use cases above incrementally rather than rebuilding your editor.
Headless mode runs the same generation and export server-side for batch and variable-data runs.

The result is the experience operators actually want to sell: the customer describes what they want, the AI does the part they were never qualified to do, and the file that reaches the press is print-correct because the pipeline enforced it, not because the customer got lucky. For the product-level view of this stack, see AI for Print on Demand.

What customers are doing with it

High-volume print and direct-mail platforms are already building on this foundation. IMG.LY powers print and personalization workflows for operators including Postbuddy (personalized direct mail), Swiss Post, Digitas, and HP, alongside hundreds of smaller print, merch, and franchise platforms.

The pattern that recurs in those conversations is narrow and specific: AI removed a bottleneck. The prepress team that fixed 40% of incoming files now lets the editor catch problems upstream. The customers who bounced at “I don’t have a good image” finish the order. The franchise network that needed a designer for every local variant generates them inside guardrails. It comes back to the point from the top: AI pays off where it deletes a step the customer couldn’t do and the operator didn’t want to.

Where to start

You don’t need all ten use cases on day one. The highest-ROI starting points, in order:

Background removal: instant, in-browser, immediately useful for any merch or photo product.
Image correction and DPI validation: catches and cleans up weak uploads before they ever reach the printer.
Generative expand / fill: kills aspect-ratio and bleed rework.
Text-to-image into locked placeholders: unblocks the “I don’t have an image” abandoner.
Vectorize: rescues logos and protects your PDF/X output.

Each one removes a documented source of friction or rework. Add them inside locked templates and a real CMYK/PDF/X pipeline, and self-service web-to-print finally works the way it was always sold: the customer really can do it themselves.

Next: which models to actually use. See the companion guide, The Best GenAI Models for Web-to-Print: A Buyer’s Guide, for a criteria-based comparison across output quality, vector/SVG support, text rendering, color, responsiveness, and cost.

What Does Print-Ready PDF Mean? Understanding PDF/X Standards for Professional Printing

Klaudia — Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:35:21 GMT

Commercial printing is unforgiving. Files need to follow pretty strict technical rules or things go sideways fast - missing fonts, wrong colors, transparency glitches and suddenly the output looks nothing like the original design. Standard PDFs are too flexible for this: they allow RGB sneaking in, optional font embedding, different transparency interpretations, and all sorts of surprises that print shops definitely don’t want.

This guide breaks down what makes a PDF actually print-ready for commercial printing, why PDF/X standards (X-1a, X-3, X-4) fix the most common issues, and how to export files that print reliably without production delays or those expensive re-prints.

What Makes a PDF Print-Ready?

A print-ready PDF is basically a normal PDF with less freedom and more control. It enforces technical requirements so nothing unpredictable happens once the file hits a press. Commercial printers deal with precise workflows that expect files prepared exactly to specification, and there’s little room to improvise when the job is already scheduled on the machine.

So what makes a file print-ready?

Fonts 100% embedded: text looks the same everywhere.
Correct color spaces: most often CMYK for presses instead of screen-only RGB sneaking in.
High-resolution images: 300 DPI (or better) for photos, 1200 DPI for line art.
Bleed included: trimming doesn’t cut off important design elements.
Transparency handled properly: either flattened or preserved correctly, depending on the workflow.
All content embedded: no external links that can break at the worst time.

What is PDF/X and Why Print Shops Require It

PDF/X is a subset of the broader PDF specification built specifically for professional printing. It removes any features that could cause printers to guess or “interpret” content differently.

Why PDF/X Exists

Normal PDFs are built for flexibility, which is great for documents that live on screens. But that flexibility can become a liability when the goal is consistent printing. A standard PDF might have a linked asset that suddenly goes missing, or a transparency effect that forces the RIP to make a decision you didn’t intend.

PDF/X basically says: No guessing. No surprises. Everything defined.

It requires full font embedding, correct color spaces, output intent profiles, and forbids interactive elements like form fields or videos. So when a PDF/X file reaches a print shop, they know exactly how the document should be printed with nothing left to interpretation.

When PDF/X is Expected

In professional settings like offset printing, packaging, magazine layouts, book production, and branded marketing materials, PDF/X is the default requirement. The cost of errors is too high to rely on files that “should be fine.”

In contrast, standard PDFs are great for digital docs, office printing, and collaboration workflows where perfect print fidelity isn’t the main objective.

PDF/X Standards: X-1a, X-3, and X-4 Explained

There isn’t just one PDF/X format. They evolved alongside printing technology.

PDF/X-1a: Most Compatible with CMYK-Only Printing

PDF/X-1a remains the most widely requested standard because it plays nicely with legacy systems and modern presses alike. It enforces CMYK-only color (plus spot colors), flattening transparency along the way. Everything in the file must be embedded, including fonts and images. This makes the file extremely predictable at every stage of print production, though transparency flattening may make files heavier and sometimes slightly alters blending appearance.

PDF/X-3: For Color-Managed Workflows

As printing workflows started adopting stronger color management, PDF/X-3 was introduced. It’s similar to X-1a but allows RGB and Lab color spaces as long as they include ICC profiles that tell the press how to interpret them. Many European workflows in particular rely on this standard.

Transparency flattening still applies, so the print shop still gets static objects but with more informative color handling.

PDF/X-4: Modern, Flexible, and Transparency-Friendly

PDF/X-4 is designed with modern digital presses and RIP systems in mind. Transparency stays live, layers are allowed, and device-independent color is supported with ICC profiles. This means:

Smaller file sizes
Faster rendering
Visual effects preserved exactly as designed

Adoption has grown a lot in recent years, but if you’re unsure whether the print provider supports it, PDF/X-1a remains the “safe option.”

Choosing the Right PDF/X Standard

Always confirm requirements with your print provider. When in doubt, PDF/X-1a offers the safest choice for compatibility, while PDF/X-4 provides advantages for modern digital workflows if supported.

How to Create Print-Ready PDF/X Files

Preparing a document for PDF/X isn’t something most designers want to think about every day. But a few fundamentals always matter:

Work in the right color settings from the start
Ensure images have high enough resolution
Embed fonts (and be sure licenses allow it)
Set trim and bleed properly in your layout

Then, during export, the software handles the heavy lifting converting colors, flattening transparency if needed, validating structure, and attaching the right ICC profile as output intent.

Manual PDF/X exports can be a bit intimidating because every piece needs to line up with specification rules. It’s why designers sometimes end up exporting multiple times (and sending multiple emails) before the print provider approves the file.

PDF/X Export with IMG.LY’s CreativeEditor SDK

The CreativeEditor SDK offers a dedicated Print-Ready PDF plugin that handles much of the complexity behind converting interactive or web-designed layouts into print-fit documents, so your team doesn’t need to become PDF or pre-press specialists.

The plugin supports workflows where you can generate print-ready files either in the editor UI or programmatically via code.

Out of the box, it can:

Convert color spaces (e.g., from RGB to CMYK using ICC-profiles such as FOGRA39) to match commercial offset printing standards.
Embed an output intent profile and set PDF-X compliance markers (for PDF/X-3:2003) so the exported PDF meets a recognized print standard.
Handle transparency flattening when required (or allow you to disable it if transparency isn’t used) to ensure reliable print output.
Enable streamlined export via JavaScript/Node or UI button, helping automate large-scale production workflows (print-on-demand, web-to-print, enterprise design platforms).

This makes it suitable for environments where you need to reliably generate thousands of output-files without needing dedicated pre-press steps.

PDF/X vs. Standard PDF: The TL;DR

Standard PDFs are more flexible for general documents and screen use but for commercial printing you want a locked-down format: specifying color space, embedding all assets, disallowing interactive elements, and including an output intent. PDF/X ensures what you send is what prints, avoiding surprises or delays at the printer.

Bottom line: If you’re building a print-workflow where precision, repeatability and automation matter, pick PDF/X (and leverage CE.SDK’s print-ready plugin) over a generic PDF export.

Getting Started

If you’re aiming for flawless print results right out of your app, the CreativeEditor SDK supports full PDF/X export. Easily test it in the interactive demo, dive into the docs, or just start a free trial and see how fast it fits into your print workflows. And if your process has unique production needs, our team’s happy to help, just reach out.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does PDF/X-1a mean?

PDF/X-1a is the most restrictive and universally supported PDF/X standard for professional printing. It requires CMYK and spot colors only (no RGB), complete font embedding, flattened transparency, defined trim and bleed boxes, and no external content references. This standard guarantees maximum compatibility with virtually all commercial printing equipment, making it the most commonly requested format by print shops.

What is the difference between PDF/X-1a and PDF/X-4?
PDF/X-1a requires CMYK-only colors and flattened transparency, ensuring maximum compatibility with all printing equipment including older systems. PDF/X-4 supports device-independent color spaces with ICC profiles and preserves native transparency without flattening, resulting in smaller file sizes and better quality for complex designs. PDF/X-4 works best with modern digital printing equipment, while PDF/X-1a remains the safer choice for universal compatibility.

Why do RGB colors cause problems in PDF/X-1a?
Commercial printing presses use CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow, black) ink, not the RGB (red, green, blue) light-based color used by screens. PDF/X-1a prohibits RGB entirely because different systems convert RGB to CMYK differently, creating unpredictable color results. By requiring CMYK-only, PDF/X-1a gives designers explicit control over color conversion rather than leaving it to the print shop’s systems, ensuring predictable and consistent color reproduction.

How do I fix font embedding errors?
Font embedding errors occur when fonts cannot be included in the PDF due to licensing restrictions or technical limitations. Verify font licensing permits embedding for commercial printing, replace restricted fonts with alternatives that allow embedding, and ensure the export system has access to complete font files, not just screen-optimized versions. For text converted to outlines, verify the conversion happened completely, as partially outlined text can cause validation errors.

What is transparency flattening and why does it matter?
Transparency flattening converts transparency effects (drop shadows, opacity changes, blend modes) into rasterized elements that can be reliably printed on any system. PDF/X-1a and X-3 require transparency flattening to ensure maximum compatibility. While flattening increases file size and can introduce visual artifacts in complex designs, it guarantees consistent reproduction across different printing equipment. PDF/X-4 preserves native transparency for modern systems that support it.

What resolution do images need for print?
Images need 300 DPI (dots per inch) at final print size for photographic content and color images. Line art should be 1200 DPI minimum. Screen-resolution images (72-96 DPI) appear pixelated when printed at commercial print resolution. Vector graphics avoid resolution issues entirely by scaling without quality loss, making them ideal for logos and illustrations.

What are bleed and trim boxes?
The trim box defines the final document size after cutting. The bleed box defines extended image areas beyond trim (typically 3mm or 0.125 inches on all sides) that account for slight variations in cutting precision. Bleed ensures design elements extend past trim edges, preventing white gaps if cutting is not perfectly precise. PDF/X files must include properly defined trim, bleed, and media boxes to pass preflight validation.

What is an output intent profile?
An output intent profile is an ICC color profile embedded in the PDF/X file that describes the intended printing condition. This profile tells the printing system how to interpret colors in the file. Common profiles include Coated FOGRA39 (ISO 12647-2:2004) for coated paper in Europe, GRACoL2006_Coated1v2 for coated paper in North America, and SWOP2006_Coated3v2 as an alternative North American standard. Always confirm the appropriate profile with your print provider.

How do I convert PDF to PDF/X-1a?
Converting existing PDFs to PDF/X-1a requires ensuring the file meets all compliance requirements: converting RGB colors to CMYK, embedding all fonts completely, flattening transparency effects, adding bleed and trim box definitions, specifying an output intent ICC profile, and embedding any linked external content. Professional PDF tools or SDKs with PDF/X export capabilities handle these conversions automatically, while manual conversion requires technical knowledge of PDF structure and color management.

Can I create PDF/X files without specialized software?
Creating compliant PDF/X files reliably requires software that understands PDF/X specifications and can handle color space conversion, font embedding validation, transparency flattening, and compliance checking. While some general PDF tools offer PDF/X export, they may not handle all compliance requirements correctly. Professional design applications (Adobe InDesign, Illustrator) include PDF/X export, or SDKs like IMG.LY’s Creative Editor SDK provide integrated PDF/X capabilities for custom applications.

Do I need PDF/X for digital printing?
Most commercial digital printing operations require PDF/X files to ensure consistent, reliable production results. Digital printing equipment processes files more predictably when color spaces, fonts, and transparency are handled consistently through PDF/X compliance. Modern digital print shops often prefer PDF/X-4 for its native transparency support and efficiency, though PDF/X-1a remains widely accepted for maximum compatibility.

Can I edit a PDF/X file after export?
PDF/X files can be edited like any PDF, but modifications may break compliance. Editing colors, fonts, images, or transparency can introduce elements that violate PDF/X requirements. After editing, the file must be re-exported as PDF/X with full compliance validation to ensure it remains print-ready. Maintaining source files (InDesign documents, design files) for editing and exporting fresh PDF/X files for each revision is the recommended workflow.

How do I check if my PDF is PDF/X compliant?
Professional PDF applications include preflight tools that validate PDF/X compliance against standard requirements. These tools check color spaces, font embedding, transparency handling, bleed and trim definitions, output intent profiles, and other technical requirements. Adobe Acrobat Pro, PitStop, and Enfocus PitStop are common preflight tools. Many print shops also run preflight validation and will notify you of compliance failures before production.

What is a PDF/X converter?
A PDF/X converter is software that transforms standard PDFs or other file formats into compliant PDF/X files. Converters handle color space conversion, font embedding, transparency flattening, metadata insertion, and validation. However, conversion quality varies significantly between tools. Files designed for print from the beginning with proper color modes and fonts typically produce better PDF/X output than files converted after creation with incompatible settings.

Is PDF/X the same as PDF/A?
No. PDF/X is designed for commercial printing and enforces print-ready requirements like CMYK color and font embedding. PDF/A is designed for long-term archiving and enforces different requirements focused on preservation and self-contained documents. PDF/A files are not necessarily print-ready, and PDF/X files are not optimized for archiving. These are distinct standards serving different purposes.

Why is my PDF/X file larger than a standard PDF?
PDF/X files can be larger due to compliance requirements. Complete font embedding adds file size compared to partial subset embedding. Transparency flattening in PDF/X-1a significantly increases size for designs with complex transparency effects, as flattened areas become rasterized rather than remaining as compact vector data. However, PDF/X-4 files are often smaller than equivalent flattened X-1a files because native transparency preserves efficient vector representation. For print production, reliability matters more than optimizing for minimal file size.

Can PDF/X files contain images?
Yes. PDF/X files contain images just like standard PDFs, but images must meet specific requirements. For PDF/X-1a, images must use CMYK or grayscale color spaces (no RGB without conversion). Images must meet minimum resolution requirements (typically 300 DPI for photos). All images must be embedded, not linked externally. PDF/X-4 allows device-independent color spaces with proper ICC profiles, providing more flexibility for image color management.

What happens if I submit a non-compliant file to a print shop?
Print shops typically run preflight validation on submitted files. Non-compliant files will be rejected with a report detailing compliance failures: RGB colors in PDF/X-1a files, missing font embedding, insufficient image resolution, missing bleed definitions, etc. Production cannot proceed until files are corrected and resubmitted. This delays timelines and can incur additional fees for file preparation services if the print shop must fix issues. Submitting compliant PDF/X files from the beginning prevents these delays and costs. No. PDF/X is designed for commercial printing and enforces print-ready requirements like CMYK color and font embedding. PDF/A is designed for long-term archiving and enforces different requirements focused on preservation and self-contained documents. PDF/A files are not necessarily print-ready, and PDF/X files are not optimized for archiving. These are distinct standards serving different purposes.

CE.SDK v1.21 Release Notes

Neslihan — Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:22:28 GMT

Since our last release, we’ve been crafting new features to empower your users’ creative journey. Today, we are happy to introduce CE.SDK v1.21!

Create Videos With A New Timeline for Web

Create eye-catching videos within your web app for any platform, including Instagram, TikTok, or YouTube! Here’s what’s new: the integrated timeline supports the arrangement of elements like videos, photos, text, audio, shapes and stickers. Users can fine-tune their projects with adjustments or filters, and personalize their creations with audio from a customizable library.

To simplify your content creation, use our formats that automatically set your canvas size for social media and other popular video resolutions.

Effectively arrange and edit multiple elements within your videos, offering precise control over the editing process. Easily split, trim, and replace. Lastly, make it pop by adding audio files to the composition.

Creating templates with placeholders for your users is just as easy. Simply select an element, click ‘Placeholder’, and decide which elements can be edited.

To integrate, browse our Guide. Try the video editor live demo yourself. This showcase contains templates, audio and video examples for you to try.

Keep Designs in Focus on iOS

Our new Camera Zoom Limits make editing a design easier. Your page stays in focus to avoid accidental scrolling outside the design. The zoom level is set within a minimum and maximum range, ensuring a practical, usable view at all times. When you select an element in your design, it stays in focus when opening adjustments or other inspectors. It allows you to immediately see changes made to the selected element. This improvement is available for iOS and Android, and can be tested in our Design Editor Demo on the App Store and Google Play.

Ensure Color Purity in Print

Our newly introduced Underlayer API guarantees the preservation of color purity whenever you export designs using our CE.SDK for print. This solution specifically addresses the challenge of maintaining the richness and vibrancy of colors, irrespective of the color of the canvas, which could range from apparel to paper.

When you’re ready to export your design, this feature adds a special ‘underbase’ layer, underneath your design. This layer, typically a white or specific primer coat, makes sure the final printed colors match your original vision perfectly.

Very soon: Integrate Short-Form Video Creation

Video remains key for attracting, engaging and retaining audiences, especially on mobile. Creating a video editor can be tough, thus we’re thrilled to soon release our turnkey solution for mobile video content creation.

Combined with our new Camera SDK, users can seamlessly blend video, audio, text, and graphics on a sleek timeline. It includes features like voiceover, zoom, tap to record, and the popular split screen modes for reactions and duets. You may recognize these from Instagram or TikTok!

Last chance: Secure your waitlist spot to our Video Content Creation Release. You will also receive access to our TestFlight app.
Registration is only open until March 6, 2024.

? Gain Access to our Video Content Creation Release
? Download Feature Exposé instantly (PDF)

We can’t wait to hear your feedback!

Thanks for reading. Join over 3000 specialists with powerful apps, and subscribe to our newsletter. We keep you in the loop with brand-new features and updates.

CE.SDK v1.16 Release Notes

Neslihan — Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:26:37 GMT

It’s getting colorful! Since our last release, we’ve been busy crafting new features and enhancements to empower your user’s creative journey. We are excited to announce that CE.SDK v1.16 is now available.

With this release, you can:

Maintain Color Consistency with CMYK & Libraries

Interfaces: Engine, Editor
Platforms: Web

We understand the importance of precise color reproduction and the need for brand consistency. That’s why we’re enhancing your editing experience with greater color control.

You can now seamlessly integrate CMYK and Pantone color spaces, along with other customized color libraries, including your brand’s unique colors.

This ensures that your designs not only meet but exceed expectations across all mediums, delivering a consistent and visually engaging experience. It also helps eliminate color inconsistencies and product returns, while ensuring color accuracy.

Learn more about adding color libraries to CE.SDK in our documentation.

Improve Web Interaction with Touch Gestures

Interfaces: Engine, Editor
Platforms: Web

With this update, we’re bringing a more interactive and responsive experience to our web applications. Let your users experience seamless multitouch interactions, even on mobile web. This ensures that the content and functionality of our web applications remain accessible and user-friendly across various devices.

Thank you for reading! Never miss out on updates and subscribe to our newsletter.

CE.SDK v1.15 Release Notes

Neslihan — Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:14:20 GMT

Since our last release, we’ve been busy crafting new features and enhancements to empower your creative editing journey. We are thrilled to release CE.SDK v1.15!

With this release, you can:

Create Accurate Cutouts and Vectors

Interfaces: Engine, Editor
Platforms: All

Picture this: Your users are deep into a design project, and need to isolate an object from an image. Our latest feature simplifies this process. Whether it’s a logo, text, or a complex shape in an SVG - by clicking “Generate from Selection”, our system precisely detects object contours and effortlessly converts them into cutout lines. This means you can breeze through your design tasks without the hassle of manual tracing.
Learn more about Cutouts in our documentation.

Effortlessly Edit Across All Screen Sizes

Interfaces: Editor
Platforms: Web

We’re excited to introduce a suite of responsive UI enhancements that ensure effortless editing on all devices, including smaller screens and mobile devices. Our editor adapts to limited screen space, automatically fits content to avoid cutoffs, hides button labels when space is tight, and ensures panels remain easy to use, even on small screens. Plus, you have complete control over when and where labels appear, allowing you to customize the interface to your liking.

Improved Android Video & Audio Experience

Interfaces: Editor, Engine
Platforms: Android

Experience an enhanced video and audio experience on Android with our latest update. With our optimized codec performance, we’ve fine-tuned our tools to ensure your videos and audio play flawlessly. Enjoy smoother playback, especially when navigating through your content. Also, no more delays or interruptions when seeking in your videos or audio files. Now, you can effortlessly skip to your desired moments for uninterrupted enjoyment.

Thank you for reading! Never miss out on updates and subscribe to our newsletter.

Interview: Talking Personalization With Richard Askam

Jan — Tue, 23 May 2023 12:39:46 GMT

When it comes to personalization in print, one name stands out: Richard Askam. With an impressive 17 years of expertise in this dynamic field and a keen awareness of emerging trends, Richard has emerged as a true pioneer in personalization within the print industry.

As the visionary behind the iconic “Share a Coke” campaign and the esteemed host of the FESPA podcast, Richard brings a wealth of invaluable insights. He sheds light on the transformative power that personalization holds in captivating audiences, forging meaningful connections, and delivering unparalleled marketing experiences. Moreover, Richard shares his perspectives on how the print industry can effectively tap into this remarkable potential.

Richard, what is personalization to you, and where do you see the value of personalization?

Personalization to me should be renamed. If we can go back and put the genie back in the bottle, then release it again but call it individualization instead. That is what it means to me, adding value and emotion to the individual. That moment when you stand in front of a loved one or colleague who you have created an individualized gift for and watch their face as they open it is priceless. This is not limited to gifting but can be used by brands to “personalize” the relationship to a deeper level with their clients by individualizing their approach. Perhaps it is time we re-branded personalization…?

You are one of the trailblazers in the personalization space, leading with the renowned “Share a Coke” campaign. The campaign was a huge success, but it began over ten years ago, and it doesn’t seem like we have seen an increase in personalized campaigns, why do you think that is?

When I first started in personalization (just over 17 years ago), it felt as though we were at the start of something. Seven years later in 2013, when Coca-Cola brought me in to work on the online Share a Coke campaign in Europe, it seemed as though personalization was beginning to take off. But now, it appears that personalization has become stuck as the idea of putting a name on something, while the wealth of opportunity to use personalization to engender loyalty and build long-term customer relationships remains largely untapped.

There’s a big difference between something that is personalized and something that is personal. Putting someone’s name on something is a great conversation starter (that was the whole point of the Share a Coke campaign), but before you do that, you need to think about what comes next. There is no point in starting a conversation and then walking away!

Personalization needs to deliver value. I don’t mean return on marketing investment; I mean value for the customer. It should enhance their lives and make them feel recognized and understood because it is this that will engender loyalty and deepen the customer relationship. When it comes to customer loyalty programs, this includes personalizing the reward (or possibly allowing the customer to choose it themselves) according to the customer’s preferences, interests, and buying behavior.

Personalized rewards can deploy the ‘surprise and delight’ marketers seek to make an emotional connection with customers. When you consider that emotionally connected customers have a higher lifetime value, stay with a brand for longer, and advocate for brands more, this alone seems a compelling reason to personalize rewards. And with research showing that consumers want to receive relevant recommendations and are more likely to make repeat purchases from companies that personalize, it is clear that consumers are looking for personalized communications too.

Perhaps this is why it has become a little stuck as in the mind of the brand, they are concerned about people’s privacy but at the same time searching for a way of unlocking the relationship. Catch 22… If there is no strategy driving your personalization efforts, then you’re just using personalization to be clever. However, while that may be great for brand awareness, it is unlikely to build loyalty. Indeed, this may be one of the factors in some marketers reconsidering their spending on personalization. In 2019, Gartner suggested that by 2025, 80% of marketers who have invested in personalization may abandon their efforts due to a lack of ROI, the challenges of managing data, or some combination of both.

Which market trends are driving the need for personalization?

I don’t see this as a market trend, more of a behavior. What was once the luxury of adding personalization to products has become the standard, the normal. So in many ways now it is the consumer driving the need and requirement for more personalized options. As with all societal changes, those that adapt to consumer demand and adopt the behavior that encourages it will triumph while those that wait for the demand to return to something they are more comfortable with –their legacy– will wither on the vine.

Why do you think printers struggle to market their personalization services to brands and agencies?

I think fundamentally printers have sprinted towards technical upgrades and capability but not slowed down to explain what that offers to brands and agencies. They have been left behind and as a consequence, are largely unaware of many of the clever ways that print can be used to further their own ambitions and build a relationship with new consumers in an increasingly noisy world, a world that is getting almost impossible to stand out in. Printers need to behave like an agency, not just a tech business, and bring brands along for the ride.

What are some technological challenges to achieve large-scale adoption of personalization in print?

There are none. Simple. As I said in the previous question, the print industry has grabbed hold of tech and run with it, and their capability to deliver large-scale adoption of personalization in print has been in place for nearly 10 years, but it feels like the best-kept secret and as such, is why personalization is still stuck as largely a labeling option.

There are many points in the customer relationship where personalization can occur, starting with the marketing message, the packaging to the product itself. At which point do you think its use is most effective?

I would say “think like a consumer.” At what point do you appreciate a personal approach, at what point does someone do something over and above the norm really grab your attention and make you lean in? This is different for every one of us, and there is no standard approach, which might explain why brands still take a standard approach to hit the average. But it’s time to think about what the individual wants and deliver on that.

We are becoming more and more numb to personalized messaging in the digital sphere, recent advances in AI will only serve to accelerate this trend. Do you think this will present print with an opportunity to stand out or does it raise the bar for personalization across the board?

As I said earlier, what was once considered luxury is now considered standard and as such, noticed less. Perhaps one of the reasons we have not seen the same quantum shift that the Share a Coke campaign delivered 10 years ago is because brands don’t want to be seen to be copying others, or they have tried something basic and consumers haven’t noticed or reacted to it. Coke moved the dial… given the wide availability of technical knowledge and print capability, it’s time the dial got moved again!

Thank you for the insightful interview, Richard. Your invaluable knowledge will undoubtedly inspire and empower others in their pursuit of personalized marketing experiences.

Looking for a solution to scale your personalization efforts? Check how IMG.LY can help with bringing personalization into your application. Stay ahead of the curve with our newsletter and sign up now!

How to Build a Cross-Platform Editing Experience for Web-to-Print

Jan — Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:34:14 GMT

We have previously talked about the importance of taking your web-to-print app cross-platform. Whether you are operating a print-on-demand platform and you want to retain customers through a mobile app, or you are developing a physical print kiosk at your point of sale, you will not get around a native editing experience.

Relegating the user experience on mobile to the back seat of your digital strategy or simply using it as a checkout front leaves real money on the table.

Customers looking for a shopping experience on mobile will not abandon the process in order to switch to the desktop to perform design tasks.

Unfortunately, it is not as easy as dropping in a web editor into your mobile app or on your website, the editing experience on the web will be massively degraded as compared with a native mobile design editor. Gesture support is limited, and interaction patterns just do not feel native, what is more, operating within the confines of the browser imposes memory constraints and the inability to take advantage of hardware acceleration.

Fortunately, IMG.LY just released full cross-platform support of the CreativeEditor SDK. You can now build on IMG.LY’s engine tech on the web, Android and iOS.

We are going to explore what goes into building a unified editing experience for a particular use case across these platforms while taking into account platform-specific patterns and usage habits.

But first, we need some background on the technology powering our cross-platform solutions.

The Foundation: Platform Agnostic Graphical Engine

The primary challenge of attempting to take a graphics processing SDK cross-platform is avoiding the need to rebuild the same technology on each platform. Instead, we aim to build on previous insights and experience and reuse as much technology as possible. After four years of research and development, IMG.LY’s Creative Engine forms one core piece of software built in C++ that implements the foundational building blocks of state-of-the-art graphics processing. Crucially, the engine can be easily ported to any platform.

This “build once, port anywhere” approach allows for the rapid rolling out of new platform support while ensuring feature parity and most essentially consistency.

Ensuring Consistent Cross-Platform Output

Consistency in this context means that design templates can be shared across platforms while always rendering the exact same output. This is challenging to accomplish if your rendering engine differs from platform to platform.

Something as seemingly innocuous as consistently rendering the same text regardless of platform turns out to be notoriously difficult.
In the context of print applications, this is the biggest technical hurdle to clear.

It is imperative for designs on mobile and the web to produce the same print-ready output file, such as a PDF. Furthermore, to be effective across platforms, users expect to save work in progress and resume it on another device. Therefore, we must support the ability to serialize and deserialize in-progress designs while ensuring consistency.

In addition to interoperability during the design process, it is often necessary to re-render user-generated designs. This is the case when designs are intended to be applied to much larger media than can be rendered on a device, such as high-resolution banners or posters. In this scenario, the serialized edits must be applied to the high-resolution medium on a server, adding yet another platform into the mix.

Designing UIs - Balancing Requirements and Constraints

To illustrate the various platform requirements and constraints involved in designing UIs, we developed starter kit editors using the CE.SDK engine for apparel design. Our apparel designer enables users to design the front of a t-shirt for deployment on web storefronts, mobile apps (Android and iOS), and print kiosks for in-store customization.

While we could have used our default Design UI and added a t-shirt backdrop, we opted for a more specific approach that prioritizes the features necessary for an optimal t-shirt design experience. Our UI places these features front and center, while also providing guardrails to prevent bad designs and hide unnecessary complexity.

Thankfully, the CE.SDK Engine allows for the creation of entirely custom UIs using any UI framework, thanks to its image and video manipulation API.

Our custom UI for editing t-shirts on the web can be used on both desktop and mobile web, as well as deployed to a print kiosk inside a web view. To create an optimal user experience, we identified the most important editing options for a t-shirt design in order of relevance: overlaying text, adding images, shapes, and stickers, and uploading new image assets.

It’s worth noting that users start from a template rather than a blank canvas. We strive to give users the best starting point for their creative journey, minimizing setup and menial work as much as possible. The same principle applies to discovering editing features. When a user selects an element, a context menu appears with essential editing options. For example, for a text element, options would include changing color, font, or alignment.

Template Creation on the Web

The most important difference between the web and mobile use cases is that templates will in almost all cases be created using the web interface, whereas users on mobile will simply adapt existing templates.

This means that in addition to the user-facing apparel UI, we also need to ship a more complex UI allowing the creation of templates. Creating templates requires more granular control over an element’s design, as well as the ability to define placeholders and design constraints.

These templates can then be deployed to the simpler adoption UIs on mobile, where the users’ design is guided by those constraints.

Mobile UIs

Designing for mobile devices presents a unique set of challenges due to the limited screen size, reliance on gestures for interaction, and hardware and bandwidth constraints. To address these constraints, we take a strict template-first approach. Most users prefer to begin their work from a template or continue working on a design they started on their desktop. Thus, the first step in the user journey is browsing and selecting designs.

In addition, we need to consider mobile interaction patterns and be even more context-sensitive than we are on the web. For instance, in a print context, the asset size is typically larger than the device’s screen size. This size limitation affects the navigation pattern, and users need to zoom in by pinching to focus on smaller elements. However, we cannot use the pinch gesture to modify an element’s size because it conflicts with the zoom gesture. Instead, users must first select the element explicitly to activate it and then change its size via a pinch gesture.

Conclusion

Creating user interfaces for designing print products on the web and mobile that allow users to be productive is a complex task. We started out by considering the technical complexities involved in bringing any cross-platform editing solution to fruition, and went on to consider both the broad strokes workflow and the minute details of individual element manipulation.

You can adapt the cross-platform apparel editor that we built in this process and integrate it into your product. Hopefully, these example UIs form a useful foundation on which to build your use case.

Designing user interfaces that allow users to create print products on web and mobile platforms is a complex task that requires a thorough understanding of technical and UX complexities. Our team embarked on this journey with a focus on bringing a cross-platform editing solution to life. We delved into the intricate details of individual element manipulation and considered the broad strokes of template-based workflow design, so you don’t have to.

Through this process, we developed a cross-platform apparel editor that can be easily adapted and integrated into your product. Our aim is to provide you with a solid foundation that will enable you to build a UI that is tailored to your use case. With our example UIs as a starting point, you can develop a product that empowers your users to create and customize print products with ease.

In conclusion, designing a user interface that allows for print product creation on web and mobile platforms is a complex undertaking. However, with the right approach and attention to detail, it is possible to create a UI that is both intuitive and efficient. Our team has provided a starting point with our cross-platform apparel editor, and we hope that it serves as a useful foundation for your own UI development efforts.

Reach out to our solutions team to explore your particular use case.

How Printers Can Leverage Creative Automation

Natalia — Tue, 04 Apr 2023 09:58:54 GMT

The emergence of print as a service and print-on-demand has changed the traditional way we think about printing, creating many possibilities for customized products, such as personalized photo books and bespoke t-shirts. However, to meet the ever-evolving needs of customers, printers must constantly innovate and streamline their operations. This is where creative automation wins.

According to Keypoint Intelligence, only a mere 7% of Print Service Providers in North America had adopted a fully or mostly automated approach across their departments in 2020. This underscores the crucial role that creative automation can play in transforming the print industry. But what exactly does creative automation mean, and how can it revolutionize print production? Let’s find out!

What is Creative Automation?

To understand the power of creative automation, it’s critical to draw a line between the production of creative assets and ad units.

Although many creative assets may eventually turn into ads, they first need to be integrated into a broader ad unit that incorporates other non-graphical elements like headlines, text, and landing pages. This ad unit is then assigned to a specific campaign.

By leveraging creative automation, each stage of the creative asset production process can be automated, enabling the entire ad production process across all placements to be streamlined.

To clarify, dynamic creative automates media buying, while creative automation utilizes advanced software to produce stunning designs quickly. This approach offers several benefits, including improved efficiency, reduced costs, and higher product quality.

Creative Automation for Print Service Providers and Print-on-Demand

The potential advantages of creative automation for Print Service Providers are significant, particularly in terms of streamlining the design process.

With tools like CE.SDK, printers can rapidly create bespoke designs for t-shirts, business cards, and other products, while also taking advantage of a wide range of templates, styles, and layouts that can be easily customized to suit any project. This not only saves time, but also ensures that each design is unique and of outstanding quality.

Print-on-Demand companies, on the other hand, can also leverage the power of creative automation to offer personalized products to customers in a rapid and efficient manner.

By utilizing creative automation tools, print-on-demand companies can develop high-quality designs for photo books, t-shirts, and mugs, without the need for manual intervention in the design process. This evolves into significant time savings, cost reductions, and increased profitability, allowing print-on-demand companies to stay ahead of the competition.

How to Apply Creative Automation in Print

So, how can printers apply creative automation in print? There are several key elements to consider, including:

Variable Data Printing is a printing technique that allows the personalization of each print piece, based on specific customer data. By automating this process, Print Service Providers can increase efficiency and accuracy, while reducing costs.
Constraints might seem like a limitation, but they’re actually a key factor in ensuring that designs are consistent during the creation process and meet industry standards. By automating the constraint process, printers can ensure that designs are consistent and meet expectations.
Templates are pre-designed layouts that can be used for specific products, such as business cards or brochures. Automation of the template process allows the quickly creating of high-quality designs, without having to start from scratch each time.
Styles are a set of design elements, such as colors, fonts, and images, that can be used to create a consistent look and feel across all designs. The style automation process brings the possibility to create a cohesive brand image, increasing brand recognition and customer loyalty.
Layouts refer to the arrangement of design elements on a page, such as images, text, and graphics. Their automation provides fast creation of stunning designs, without having to manually arrange each element.
Design Validation is like having an eagle eye that spots mistakes (such as incorrect dimensions) before they become costly printing errors. Automating the design validation process allows printers to quickly identify and correct errors, reducing the risk of printing errors and increasing customer satisfaction.

Creative Automation in Print with CE.SDK

CE.SDK is a powerful tool for creative automation in print, taking care of the entire design process, from layout to validation.

With CE.SDK, you can easily create brilliant designs for various products, without having to spend time on manual design processes. The platform also offers a range of templates, styles, and layouts that can be easily customized to meet the needs of each project.

For instance, let’s say you want to create a gorgeous photo book for a client. With CE.SDK, all you have to do is upload your images, select a template, and customize the design elements.

CE.SDK will take care of the rest, automatically arranging the images into a beautifully designed photo book that includes text, graphics, and other design elements. This not only saves time, but also ensures that each photo book is unique and of high quality.

Here are some easy steps to follow when creating a photo book:

Step 1: Organize your Photos

Choose the photos you want to include in your photo book and organize them in a way that tells a story. For instance, you can arrange them chronologically or by theme.

Step 2: Customize your Photo Book

Then, add a personal touch to your photo book by customizing the text, adding captions, or changing the font style and color.

Step 3

Once you’ve finished customizing your template, you can preview the final result, and send it out for printing.

Conclusion

In today’s ever-changing printing industry, printers need to be efficient, innovative, and creative to remain competitive. Creative automation provides an excellent solution, enabling printers to streamline their design process, reduce costs, and improve profitability while delivering exceptional, personalized products to their customers.

CE.SDK is a powerful tool for creative automation in print, offering a wide range of customizable templates, styles, and layouts that can be tailored to meet the unique requirements of each project. With CE.SDK, printers can create stunning designs for a range of products, from personalized t-shirts to exquisite photo books, all while saving time and money. Try CE.SDK for free and see the benefits of creative automation for yourself.

Why Mobile-First is the Future of Print

Klaudia — Thu, 23 Feb 2023 13:11:09 GMT

Over the last 30 years, mobile phones have heavily influenced lifestyles across the globe. They have changed the way we communicate, spend leisure time, look for information, and shop.

Thanks to its accessibility and powerful capabilities, mobile has eclipsed the desktop. Statista reported last year, 59% of all global web traffic came from mobile, with almost five billion people accessing the internet through mobile devices. Moreover, since 2018, app usage has exceeded browser usage on mobile devices, with shopping apps noting 49% year-over-year usage increase between 2020 & 2021.

This means companies have to not only provide a seamless mobile experience if they wish to attract and convert users, but also invest in app development to stay ahead of the curve.

Market Trends

The printing industry is showing no signs of slowing down. In 2021, the global print-on-demand market was valued at $4.90 billion, and it’s projected to generate $39.40 billion in revenue by 2030, according to industry reports from Grand View Research. The report also suggests that print-on-demand is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 26.1% from 2022 to 2030, indicating significant potential for further expansion.

However, print-on-demand is not the only promising sector to watch. The Print Advertising segment is projected to have ad spending worth $46.87 billion in 2023. This sector has remained resilient to the global decline in the print industry during the Covid-19 pandemic, registering an 18% revenue increase in the US between 2019 and 2020.

With the printing industry’s rapid growth, competition is likely to increase, making it essential for companies to prioritize excellence in order to attract and retain customers.

User Preference

It’s undeniable that mobile is becoming increasingly dominant in e-commerce. According to Shopify, almost 50% of all e-commerce transactions are predicted to occur via mobile devices by 2024, with an expected revenue of $620.97 billion. Being able to quickly and effectively serve customers on mobile is now essential for businesses looking to thrive. In 2022, Shopify launched shop.app, a mobile-only e-commerce platform, raising the bar for the industry. To stay competitive, other e-commerce businesses will need to develop similarly sophisticated solutions for mobile users.

Having a seamless mobile experience is also an important factor for B2B companies. Although most interactions still occur on desktop, modern working arrangements allow people to work on the go, without being limited to one device. Providing customers with flexible options is a significant advantage. For example, a web-to-print editor for print advertising should be cross-platform, providing the same experience across all devices during design creation and print validation processes. Offering agile solutions ahead of industry standards can position a company as a go-to service provider. However, an excellent editor alone is not enough; covering the basics of a good mobile experience is crucial.

Game-Changing Mobile Factors

Customers are becoming more unforgiving when it comes to poor user experience. According to Google, 61% of mobile users won’t return to a site they had trouble accessing, with 40% turning to a competitor’s site instead. For print companies relying almost exclusively on online purchases, this poses a substantial threat, hence, the need to fulfill a long list of expectations to satisfy users.

While the ultimate recommendation is to build a mobile app, customers will most likely want to check out the web page first, hence, the importance of providing a spotless web experience.

Here are some of the most prominent factors of mobile UX to optimize.

Design Editing

While for most e-commerce stores developing a smooth purchase experience is rather straightforward, many printing companies have an added layer of complication - catering to custom-made products. Once a rarity, personalization of products has proven to be a constantly growing trend many companies choose to embrace, and rightly so. The global Custom T-shirt Printing market alone was valued at $3.7 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach $6.98 billion by 2028.

With a growing demand for custom prints, follows a necessity for a web-to-print editor that will provide a seamless design process - on both desktop and mobile. Web-to-print editor simplifies artwork supply, jumpstarts the creative process, and takes care of print validation. The ideal tool should be intuitive to navigate and have a quick load time while providing a quality design experience. The same approach should be adopted by print service providers, breaching a gap between multiple software and communication channels clients have to endure.

A powerful web-to-print editor doesn’t just enhance the user experience on your website - it can also open new doors for your business, such as scaling to native mobile apps, print kiosks, and terminals. Developing separate tools for each platform can be time-consuming and costly. With ready-made solutions (as we will discover below), you can speed up the development process and achieve a seamless editing experience across all devices without starting from scratch each time.

Site Speed

In a study conducted by Deloitte, they observed that a difference of 0.1 seconds has improved conversion rate by 8% and increased purchase value by 10% in the retail sector. The highest conversion rate occurs on pages with a load time of 0-2 seconds, and as reported by Google, 53% of users abandon the page if the load time takes more than 3 seconds. Moreover, it has been estimated that slow-loading websites cost retailers $2.6 billion in lost sales every year.

It’s also worth mentioning that Core Web Vitals monitoring page speed is a Google ranking factor. Poor page speed performance will in turn take a hit on rankings - and with a loss of each position on the Search Engine Result Page, the click-through rate falls significantly.

Investing in optimizing page speed and providing a smooth user experience is a win-win on every front.

Mobile-First Design

Responsive web design is not enough anymore. Websites have to be built with a mobile-first approach in mind. What’s the difference? Responsive design ensures that a page can be viewed on all devices, changing its dimensions to fit different screen sizes. The content and the layout of the page, however, remain unchanged.

While responsive web design is just a part of the design workflow making sure a website is accessible for mobile, mobile-first defines the design approach and focuses on creating a website that is intended for mobile users. It means that every aspect of mobile interaction is taken into account when designing a page.

While the general layout of a page is important for both desktop and mobile, clickable elements of design such as buttons and navigation menus can have larger importance for mobile users. Navigating with a thumb or a finger poses more challenges than a neat computer cursor. The mobile-first design makes sure that every part of the page - content, media, navigation, and calls-to-action, feels intuitive to navigate and use. However, even the best mobile-first web design can’t compare to native mobile apps, which usability and performance are far superior.
Hence, mobile-first should be a necessity embraced by all, those who want to go a step further and provide a fully optimized user experience should turn their eyes to app development.

Payments

The simplicity of mobile payments is yet another reason why mobile purchases are on the rise. Mobile wallet solutions like Google Pay, Apple Pay, and Samsung Pay allow users to complete a transaction with just one click, removing the need for credit card input.

Nowadays, providing an easy and quick checkout experience is more important than ever. Over the last few years, the cart abandonment rate significantly increased, from 59.80% back in 2006 to 88.05% in 2020. Focusing on optimizing the checkout and payment processes could reduce the risk of not completing a purchase. A great example of a seamless payment experience is Shopify’s Shop.app with a one-tap checkout, making it as easy as possible for users to convert.

The checkout funnel is also a great space to utilize personalization hacks and recommend similar products. Instapage reported that shopping cart recommendations influence 92% of users, making it a great tool to increase basket size.

Beyond Browser - Investing in Mobile Apps

Mobile app downloads increased by over 80% since 2016, reaching a mighty 255 billion in 2022. The growing popularity of mobile apps is quite understandable, apps provide a better native experience, are easier to navigate, and usually provide personalized recommendations and remember users’ last activity (58% of users consider this important).

In-app shopping, when correctly optimized, is quick and easy, with enhanced product presentation, intuitive navigation, and no unnecessary hassle of filling in forms and adding credit card details.

Print is once again one of the industries that could leverage all advantages mobile apps have to offer. An example of a company that did it right is IMG.LY’s customer Shutterfly, which combined the emerging trends of personalization and going mobile. The company developed an app that automatically creates personalized items users can purchase. They simply ask for permission to access user’s photo gallery, identify pictures with faces and apply them to product templates. This way, customers can be presented with unique products with zero effort of creating an actual design.

Even without automatically generated custom products, an app-to-print editor provides a much smoother editing experience and interface, with native hardware acceleration, local storage, and easier access to photos or even a camera. Moreover, apps present the possibility to provide more accurate recommendations and personalized content, like in-app notifications, reminders, and activity-based discounts. Hence, developing a quality mobile app could not only boost sales, but also increase brand loyalty and customer satisfaction.

Streamlining Mobile Web-to-Print Editing with CE.SDK

With the undeniable advantages of web-to-print design tools come significant challenges in their development. However, CreativeEditor SDK offers a powerful design editor that delivers consistent experiences across all platforms. Our cross-platform engine can power any editor UI, ensuring 100% consistency in the rendered designs across different devices.

Discover how CE.SDK can streamline your mobile web-to-print process with the following capabilities:

Efficient Client-Side Encoding

Our client-side encoding ensures a smooth and fast design process, as the editor runs directly on the user’s mobile device or web browser. This not only reduces upload time and bandwidth costs, but also allows for easy scalability without incurring additional server costs.

Seamless Cross-Platform Integration

CE.SDK simplifies the process of building an application for the web, iOS, Android, and server by providing a creative engine that’s portable across all platforms. This means that you can easily integrate our solution into your existing systems, saving valuable time and resources. And with consistent design and functionality across all devices, your users can switch between platforms with ease.

Powerful Editing Features

With CE.SDK, your users can unleash their creativity and design high-quality prints effortlessly. Take advantage of our powerful editing features, including the ability to capture and edit photos. CE.SDK also allows you to predefine the design process with adjustable placeholders and constraints, making sure that your final product meets all of the necessary print criteria.

Preview & Design Validation

Imagine being able to preview your design in real-time, ensuring your product expectations are exceeded every time. Plus, with automatic design validation, you can rest easy knowing that no element will extend beyond the bleed margins, minimizing the risk of misprints. Don’t just take our word for it, check out our showcases and see for yourself how CE.SDK can transform your design process.

Conclusion

As we navigate the ever-changing landscape of technology, it’s important to stay ahead of the curve and keep up with emerging trends. With mobile devices becoming increasingly essential in our lives, it’s an crucial time to invest in creating a delightful mobile experience for your customers. By designing an intuitive website, prioritizing fast page load times, and providing a smooth checkout process, you can create a seamless experience for your users. And for print companies, taking it a step further with an exceptional in-app custom-print design tool is a must to help users bring their dream creations to life. These investments can not only enhance customer satisfaction but also give your business a competitive edge in the market.

However, building a cross-platform editor from scratch can be a time-consuming and costly venture with numerous technical challenges. Fortunately, IMG.LY has developed a solution for those who want a quicker and more efficient option. Check out our CreativeEditor SDK, which enables seamless integration of a robust editor for web-to-print across desktop, mobile, and server.

If you’re interested in integrating CE.SDK, our documentation provides detailed information on how to get started, or you can try it out for free!

Thanks for reading. To stay in the loop, subscribe to our Newsletter

IMG.LY's Founders Discuss Personalization on the FESPA Podcast

Jan — Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:41:40 GMT

The Personalization Experience is a new initiative by the global print expo FESPA that brings together over 3,000 stakeholders from every part of the print value chain, from brands and agencies to retailers, printers, and their suppliers. Its goal is to connect them with OEMs and software providers to explore the potential of personalization in sportswear, packaging, products, loyalty, and custom interiors.

The Personalization Experience Podcast features a series of interviews with key stakeholders to set the tone for the conference. In one such interview, Richard Askam spoke with our founders to discuss how IMG.LY’s solution fits into this puzzle.

Key Takeaways

Where does IMG.LY sit in the world of personalization?

IMG.LY started out by bringing photo and video editing to software on the web and on mobile as a classic SDK. This experience gave us some perspective on the overarching creative needs in digital and physical industries.

We set our eyes on this grander scheme and build a universal creative tool enabling workflows and automation in a fraction of the time and money you’d spent implementing creative capabilities yourself.

Personalization is at the core of IMG.LY’s CreativeEditor SDK, and it is being used to add personalization capabilities to print products as well as marketing and e-commerce applications.

What are the unique capabilities of IMG.LY’s SDK for personalization?

Any editing experience starts either from a blank canvas or a predefined design a user can adopt. The crucial insight is that every product needs a slightly different editing experience, both from the editor and templating point of view. Most design tools are far too complex for the average user to employ effectively, so we spent a lot of time figuring out the best starting point for every use case. Users can then tweak and adapt to add the core personalization element without worrying about designing non-essential elements from scratch.

Furthermore, personalization does not always have to require individual input, it can happen in an automated fashion as well. That is why CreativeEditor SDK also supports powerful automation features that enable variable data printing and mass customization using personal data.

What is the state of personalization in the print industry?

During his 15+ years in the personalization business, Richard has encountered a common objection: it’s just not cost-effective to print a single item. However, his go-to rejoinder is that you are printing a million ones. While the technical feasibility of personalization is present, the print industry has traditionally been hesitant to promote personalization to customers. Fortunately, this is changing with unit economics that are reducing the cost of small-batch printing, coupled with readily available personalization software such as IMG.LY’s CreativeEditor SDK.

While technology infrastructure can be a significant cost, CreativeEditor SDK can substantially bring down costs and facilitate a faster time to market. More importantly, personalization adds substantial value to any product and increases customers’ willingness to pay, easily offsetting any cost increase.

What is the biggest barrier to personalization?

Many things need to come together for personalization to go fully mainstream. In addition to the technical capacity and brands’ willingness to take risks with personalization, the process from the consumer end must also be accessible. However, it is not always clear how to add consumer-facing personalization capabilities to an existing product. Starting with a design generated outside the core workflow of a printing application can be cumbersome and create too much friction for consumer-scale deployment.

Nevertheless, as more print applications appear in the wild and positive examples are set, user habits form, and the adoption of personalization becomes more widespread, the easier it will become for all stakeholders to adopt personalization on a larger scale.

There’s a growing trend that is making simpler personalization increasingly important, and that is the decreasing costs of hardware. Even high-end industrial printers are becoming more affordable, which means smaller shops can now acquire industrial-grade printers. However, this also brings new challenges, as smaller shops may not have the design resources to implement personalization on the frontend of their powerful hardware. This is where IMG.LY’s editor comes in - it provides design capabilities to the printer’s customers and creates an ecosystem around the editor that offers templates and other assets to use for print designs.

If you’re interested in discussing personalization or want to explore a solution for your use case, we invite you to meet us at FESPA 2023 or reach out to us directly.

Personalize or Perish: Why Companies Need to Go Personal

Klaudia — Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:34:58 GMT

In the past, tailor-made marketing campaigns and personalized products were seen as a luxury that only a few companies could afford. However, as we enter 2023, personalization has become essential for all industries. Consumers now expect to see relevant and relatable content on a regular basis, which means that leveraging personalization on at least one channel has become a must-have.

Many marketers already use personalization techniques to retain customers and boost conversions. However, with new trends constantly emerging, there’s a risk of falling behind. If you’re still unconvinced that personalization is the future, we’ve put together an overview of why it should be a top priority for your business strategy.

What is Personalization?

First, let’s clarify what personalization actually means. The most straightforward way to explain personalization would be tailoring of marketing materials, campaigns, and products to individuals’ specific characteristics, preferences, and needs in order to provide a more relevant and engaging experience.

With technological development, companies are finding new ways to apply personalization across their businesses, ways beyond mere “Hello [name]” emails. For industries like e-commerce or printers, the personalization approach has been extended all the way to the production stage - allowing customers to incorporate their own designs and purchase a unique product made exclusively for them. Others, rely on algorithms to make sure that customers are always presented with the most relevant and engaging content. Regardless of the industry, everyone is looking to take advantage of personalization approaches.

Benefits of Personalization

Personalization is by default a user-centric approach, prioritizing relevance, usability, and impact of provided content and features. Thoroughly planned personalized marketing campaigns can make or break new product launches, boost subscription numbers, or convert lingering customers.
For industries like e-commerce and print, enabling customers to design or customize their own product means higher sales and lower return rates - which translates to not only a higher profit margin but also a more sustainable shopping experience.

Companies efficiently utilizing personalization efforts can expect:

Deeper connection between brand and customer
Increased brand loyalty and customer retention
Higher conversion rates

Treating customers with individual attention and care creates a sense of connection going beyond just purchasing needs. When customers are faced with meaningful content they are able to find what they need more easily, creating a pleasant user experience. Instapage reported that 74% of customers feel frustrated when website content is not personalized. Making them more likely to stick with brands that go the extra mile.

Moreover, presenting customers with relevant recommendations or tailor-made discounts significantly increases chances of conversion. According to Business Insider, 47% of customers turn to Amazon if the brand they are shopping with doesn’t provide personalized product suggestions. The ability to quickly find what is needed might just be the difference between making a sale and losing a customer.

Leveraging Personalization

Applications of personalization are limited only by imagination and creativity. The right personalization approach can sometimes equal to the success of an entire business. Hard to imagine Spotify being so popular without its flawless personalization algorithms alongside giants like Netflix or Amazon which heavily rely on personalization to retain subscriptions and push sales.

Fortunately, personalization is not reserved for large enterprises only, it can be used just as efficiently by any other company, regardless of its size. Thanks to its versatility, it can be utilized across different channels, platforms, and consumer touchpoints. Some of the most popular uses of personalization include:

Marketing

For brands and marketing agencies, personalization usually translates to displaying personalized content - be it product, service, or piece of information, alongside ensuring relevant outreach - with tailor-made emails and ads. The success of marketing personalization efforts usually depends on quality of gathered data and right algorithms. Unfortunately, finding a winning approach means little without having a way to scale it. Companies that wish to succeed with their marketing personalization strategy usually have to turn to automation of workflows and creative materials.

E-Commerce

Apart from applying personalization in their marketing efforts, e-commerce companies have the advantage of extending it all the way to their products. Allowing customers to add a custom engraving or artwork creates a more intimate shopping experience with irreplaceable product added value. Companies that cannot offer those services have also found a way to leverage personalization, usually by providing options to add a custom greeting card, thank you note, or even record a custom message.

Print Products

Print products might have the most exciting and yet still underutilized personalization growth possibility. While photo printers have been profiting from personalization for quite some time, there is still a large portion of the industry lagging behind. Personalization of any printed materials like photos, posters, cards, marketing materials, or apparel items is the future. And certainly, the future customers are impatiently looking forward to.

However, personalization leaves nobody behind. For those unable to provide such services, there is a whole world of personalized packaging and labels to take advantage of and create a meaningful customer experience.

Personalization Challenges

With all the benefits and possibilities of personalization, it seems like every company should have mastered it by now. So why it isn’t so? Scaling personalization can proven to be a challenging task. It requires a strategy on how to gather data sensibly, translate it into initiatives, and bring those initiatives to life. Some of the most common challenges of scaling personalization are as follows.

Data Collection and Preparation

In order to create relevant personalization of marketing content and materials first there must be data that can support this. With topics of privacy policies and data protection on the rise, targeted ads and campaigns might seem obsolete. The key to leveraging personalization is understanding the fine line between providing experience that feels relevant and welcomed, not invasive and overbearing. Another factor contributing to positive results is the transparency of collected data and how it’s being used. Harvard Business Review conducted a study that reported that when customers were openly informed their ads were based on their online activity revenue grew by 38%. With data becoming a currency of its own, honest communication seems to be the key to successful personalization campaigns.

Creative Materials Production

Personalization is loved by marketers because they know how much it helps with engagement and conversion rates. However, it can be dreaded by designers and creative teams. Production of personalized marketing materials can create a painful bottleneck and freeze resources for extended periods of time. The only way to scale production and reduce efforts is by implementing software that can automate a large portion of the work with templates and variable data imports. Designers can create adjustable templates and the marketing team can adapt them to their needs, making the process fast and accessible to all.

Custom Prints

The most significant challenges of personalized print products usually revolve around artwork supply and print quality. Different resolutions, file formats, and design quality might mean the back and forth of proofreading, rejecting, and proofreading again. Custom prints might also pose a risk of misprints and trademark infringements, as well as mismatched expectations - especially if there is no preview function of the ready product. A solution for those headaches would be a web-to-print editor, which can not only improve the design creation process, but also automatically validate designs and generate previews.

Scale Personalization with CE.SDK

CreativeEditor SDK was developed with the thought of bringing automation and scalability to creative materials. Because of its versatility and extensive features, it can be applied across all industries and utilized on all channels and platforms, and addresses some of the most burning questions limiting the current use of personalization.

Personalized Cross-Channel Content

How do you create personalized content that can be implemented for a large audience across multiple channels, all with limited resources? The short answer is automation. Creating countless variations of marketing materials has to be automated, otherwise, it cannot be scaled.

The most efficient way is to work with adjustable templates and data variation imports. Designers can create as many templates as needed, making sure they stay on brand, while marketers and social media creators can adapt them to their needs.

CreativeEditor SDK offers the possibility of creating smart templates with adjustable placeholders and constraints. This way, editing of any design is done in a controlled and predefined way. The editor can be used by internal teams, as well as external clients and customers, making the production of all marketing materials easily scalable.

How to Develop a Web2print Editor in a Timely Manner?

The most time-efficient way is to use Software Development Kit. SDKs contain powerful features with quick and easy integration and give the opportunity to stay on brand with customizable UI.

Choosing CE.SDK, whether for photo prints, apparel, or marketing materials, can streamline the web2print process and solve many of the custom print challenges. With smart templates, companies can jumpstart their customers’ creative process, ensuring right design dimensions and quality. While automatic design validation safeguards the printing process with notifications of artwork exceeding bleed margin, as well as checking for harmful content or trademark infringements.

Conclusion

Regardless if you use it as a key component or part of a bigger strategy, personalization is here to stay, and it will most likely determine the success of many brands and industries. Staying up to date with current personalization trends is becoming a must for marketers, with a growing need to think outside the box. The ability to scale personalized marketing materials, and provide bespoke user experience and relevant recommendations, are the future of reaching conversion goals and building lasting relationships with customers.

Companies will have to find ways to easily and efficiently scale personalization and bring it to their users. IMG.LY developed tools to help with those efforts. Learn more about CE.SDK capabilities or see how to use it for Creative Automation process or Web-to-Print.

If you want to learn more about integrating CE.SDK, check out our documentation or try it for free!

Thanks for reading. To stay in the loop, subscribe to our Newsletter.